The diagnostic utility of computed tomography scans performed for febrile neutropenia in a single centre.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) imaging has become a first line investigation for most cases of febrile neutropenia (FN) which can be the only sign of infection in oncology patients undergoing active chemotherapy and bone marrow transplants. The utility of routine non-targeted imaging remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the diagnostic rate between targeted, non-targeted and pan-scan CT in identifying an acute source of infection in adult oncology patients with FN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted between February 2019 and March 2023 on 417 consecutive CT examinations for the clinical indication of source identification in FN. Scans were noted for the anatomical regions that were imaged and reports were classified as positive, negative or equivocal for infection. Pre-existing pathology was also noted. Results were tabulated and statistical analyses for comparison between groups of scans was performed using chi-square test. RESULTS: All targeted regional scans had statistically significant difference in positive rate compared to non-targeted scans of the respective region; chest (Χ²(1)=18.11, P<.001); sinus (Χ²(1)=15.36, P<.001); abdomen and pelvis (Χ²(1)=5.95, P=.01). Pneumonia (41.3 %) was much more likely to be the diagnosis compared to sinusitis (16.2 %) in concomitant CT chest to sinus examinations (Χ²(1)=45.3, P<.001). Pan-scans had a higher incidence of positive diagnosis compared to all-targeted scans (Χ²(1)=4.91, P=.03) but when compared to higher yield targeted scans (abdomen and chest), there was no statistical difference (Χ²(1)=2.43, P=.12). 20/54 patients had pan-scans despite having localising symptoms. CONCLUSION: Imaging guided by presenting signs and symptoms can help to reduce unnecessary imaging and promote more judicious use of non-targeted and pan-scan CT in current practices.

Bacterial Isolates and Characteristics of Children With Febrile Neutropenia on Treatment for Cancer at a Tertiary Hospital in Western Kenya.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the patient characteristics of children with febrile neutropenia, the associated bacterial organisms, and their sensitivity patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH) pediatric oncology ward, from June 2021 to April 2022. A total of 110 children who developed fever and neutropenia during chemotherapy were enrolled. Blood samples for culture were collected aseptically. Patient characteristics were presented in frequency tables. Antimicrobial sensitivity patterns were plotted in tables against the bacterial isolates cultured. Chi-square/Fisher's exact test was used to determine any association between patient characteristics, bacterial growth, and antimicrobial sensitivity. RESULTS: The majority (n = 66; 60%) were males. The median age was 6.3 years (standard deviation, 3.7). The majority of patients 71 (64.5%) had hematologic malignancies, the most common being AML. There was a significant association between severity of neutropenia and hematologic malignancies (P = .028). In total, 31/110 (28.2%) blood cultures were positive for bacterial growth. Gram-positive bacteria were more frequent (n = 20; 58.1%). The most common organism was Escherichia coli (n = 6; 18.2%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n = 5; 15.2%). All the isolates were sensitive to linezolid and vancomycin and also showed good sensitivity toward meropenem (n = 10/11; 90.9%). High resistance to cephalosporins was noted with ceftriaxone (n = 5/6; 83.3%), cefepime (n = 4/7; 57.1%), and ceftazidime (n = 3/4; 75%). CONCLUSION: The most common malignancy associated with febrile neutropenia was AML. Gram-positive bacteria were the most common isolates. There was high resistance to cephalosporins.

[Neutropenia - when is GCSF support indicated?] / Neutropenie ­ wann ist eine GCSF Unterstützung notwendig?

Many systemic treatments used in genitourinary oncology negatively affect haematopoiesis, thus leading to neutropenia. Neutropenic patients are vulnerable to bacterial, and other infections. Often fever is the only symptom in these patients. Neutropenic fever is a major threat for these patients, as it may lead to life-threatening therapy complications that significantly impair the patient's quality of life, Moreover, it may also worsen the prognosis due to therapy delays or necessary dose modifications. Granulocyte colony stimulating factors (GCSF), which can improve neutrophil granulocyte formation, are used both for supportive treatment in febrile neutropenia and for its prophylaxis. The correct indication for such GCSF support depends on the general risk of febrile neutropenia of the therapy used, as well as on individual patient factors and the treatment intent (palliative vs. curative). Based on the current recommendations both of the German and international guidelines, this article aims to provide an up-to-date and practice-oriented overview of the use of GCSF in uro-oncology.

Is Short-Course Antibiotic Therapy Suitable for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections in Onco-hematology Patients With Febrile Neutropenia? Results of a Multi-institutional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that short-course antibiotic therapy was effective in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) bloodstream infections (BSI) in immunocompetent patients. But similar studies in patients with hematological malignancies were rare. METHODS: This cohort study included onco-hematology patients at 2 hematology centers in China. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the confounding factors. Multivariate regression model was used to evaluate the effect of short-course antibiotic therapy on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 434 patients met eligibility criteria (short-course, 7-11 days, n = 229; prolonged, 12-21 days, n = 205). In the weighted cohort, the univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that short course antibiotic therapy had similar outcomes to the prolonged course. The recurrent PA infection at any site or mortality within 30 days of completing therapy occurred in 8 (3.9%) patients in the short-course group and in 10 (4.9%) in the prolonged-course group (P = .979). The recurrent infection within 90 days occurred in 20 (9.8%) patients in the short-course group and in 13 (6.3%) patients in the prolonged-course group (P = .139), and the recurrent fever within 7 days occurred in 17 (8.3%) patients in the short-course group and in 15 (7.4%) in the prolonged-course group (P = .957). On average, patients who received short-course antibiotic therapy spent 3.3 fewer days in the hospital (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In the study, short-course therapy was non-inferior to prolonged-course therapy in terms of clinical outcomes. However, due to its biases and limitations, further prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to generalize our findings.

Impact of Time-to-Antibiotic Delivery in Pediatric Patients With Cancer Presenting With Febrile Neutropenia.

PURPOSE: Febrile neutropenia (FN) in pediatric patients with cancer can cause severe infections, and prompt antibiotics are warranted. Extrapolated from other populations, a time-to-antibiotic (TTA) metric of <60 minutes after medical center presentation was established, with compliance data factoring into pediatric oncology program national rankings. METHODS: All FN episodes occurring at Vanderbilt Children's Hospital (2007-February 2022) and a sample of episodes from Colorado Children's Hospital (2012-2019) were abstracted, capturing TTA and clinical outcomes including major complications (intensive care unit [ICU] admission, vasopressors, intubation, or infection-related mortality). Odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for age, treatment center, absolute neutrophil count, hypotension presence, stem-cell transplant status, and central line type. RESULTS: A total of 2,349 episodes were identified from Vanderbilt (1,920) and Colorado (429). Only 0.6% (n = 14) episodes required immediate ICU management, with a median TTA of 28 minutes (IQR, 20-37). For the remaining patients, the median TTA was 56 minutes (IQR, 37-90), and 54.3% received antibiotics in <60 minutes. There were no significant associations between TTA (<60 or ≥60 minutes) and major complications (adjusted OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.59]; P = .98), and a TTA ≥60 minutes was not associated with any type of complication. Similarly, TTA, when evaluated as a continuous variable, was not associated with a major (OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.94 to 1.04]; P = .69) nor any other complication in adjusted analysis. CONCLUSION: There is no clear evidence that a reduced TTA improves clinical outcomes in pediatric oncology FN and thus it should not be used as a primary quality measure.

Ambulatory management of low-risk febrile neutropenia in adult oncological patients. Systematic review.

PURPOSE: Recent clinical practice guidelines have recommended ambulatory management of febrile neutropenia in patients with low risk of complications. Although some centers have begun developing management protocols for these patients, there appears to be a certain reluctance to implement them in clinical practice. Our aim is to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of this strategy according to available evidence and to propose new lines of research. METHODS: Systematic review using a triple aim approach (efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life), drawing from literature in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The review includes studies that assess ambulatory management for efficacy, cost-efficiency, and quality of life. RESULTS: The search yielded 27 articles that met our inclusion criteria. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, based on current evidence, ambulatory management of febrile neutropenia is safe, more cost-effective than inpatient care, and capable of improving quality of life in oncological patients with this complication. Ambulatory care seems to be an effective alternative to hospitalization in these patients.

Etiology and Factors Affecting Severe Complications and Mortality of Febrile Neutropenia in Children with Acute Leukemia

Objective: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is an important complication that causes high rates of morbidity and mortality in patients with malignancies. We aimed to investigate the etiology, epidemiological distribution and its change over the years, clinical courses, and outcomes of FN in children with acute leukemia. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the demographic data, clinical characteristics, laboratory results, severe complications, and mortality rates of pediatric patients with FN between January 2010 and December 2020. Results: In 153 patients, a total of 450 FN episodes (FNEs) occurred. Eighty-four (54.9%) of these patients were male, the median age of the patients was 6.5 (range: 3-12.2) years, and 127 patients (83%) were diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Fever with a focus was found in approximately half of the patients, and an etiology was identified for 38.7% of the patients. The most common fever focus was bloodstream infection (n=74, 16.5%). Etiologically, a bacterial infection was identified in 22.7% (n=102), a viral infection in 13.3% (n=60), and a fungal infection in 5.8% (n=26) of the episodes. Twenty-six (23.2%) of a total of 112 bacteria were multidrug resistant (MDR) The rate of severe complications was 7.8% (n=35) and the mortality rate was 2% (n=9). In logistic regression analysis, refractory/relapsed malignancies and high C-reactive protein (CRP) at first admission were found to be the most important independent risk factors for mortality. Prolonged neutropenia after chemotherapy, diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia, identification of fever focus or etiological agents, invasive fungal infections, polymicrobial infections, and need for intravenous immunoglobulin treatment increased the frequency of severe complications. Conclusion: We found that there was no significant change in the epidemiological distribution or frequency of resistant bacteria in our center in the last 10 years compared to previous years. Prolonged duration of fever, relapsed/refractory malignancies, presence of fever focus, and high CRP level were significant risk factors for poor clinical course and outcome.

Role of urine culture in paediatric patients with cancer with fever and neutropenia: a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the need for routine urine studies in children with febrile neutropenia with cancer. DESIGN: A prospective, observational study was conducted in two hospitals between November 2019 and October 2021. PATIENTS: We recruited 205 patients in total. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was presence of positive urine culture (UC). Urinary tract infection (UTI) was defined as urinary signs/symptoms and positive UC with or without pyuria. A descriptive analysis of data is provided.We conducted a prospective study of paediatric patients with cancer with urinary continence. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. The diagnostic performance of urinalysis was calculated using positive UC as the gold standard. RESULTS: Positive UC was found in 7 of the 205 patients (3.4%; 95% CI 1.4% to 6.9%), 2 presenting urinary symptoms. UTI prevalence was 1.0% (95% CI 0.1% to 3.5%). A 23.8% prevalence of positive UC was found in patients with urinary symptoms and/or history of urinary tract disease (95% CI 8.2% to 47.2%) as compared with 1.1% of those without symptoms or history (95% CI 0.1% to 3.9%) (p<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and area under the curve for urinalysis were 16.7% (95% CI 3.0% to 56.4%), 98.4% (95% CI 95.3% to 99.4%), 97.3% (95% CI 93.9% to 98.9%), and 0.65 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.79), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: UTI is an infrequent cause of infection in these patients. Urinalysis is indicated only in children with febrile neutropenia with urinary signs/symptoms and in asymptomatic patients with a history of urinary tract disease or unknown history. When urine is collected, UC should be requested regardless of the result of the urinalysis.

A retrospective study of treatment and outcomes of patients with lymphoma undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Early evaluation of symptoms and taking appropriate preventive measures can improve outcomes for patients with lymphoma undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This study aimed to examine the treatment and outcomes of patients with lymphoma undergoing HSCT. METHODS: Patients with lymphoma undergoing SCT at a university hospital between 15.06.2018 and 15.06.2020, were selected for a retrospective study. The medical treatments of patients were obtained from the records on the Hospital Information Management System (HIMS) database. The study was reported following the STROBE checklist. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 48.25 ± 16.93 (p = 0.76). Although relapse developed in 26 (40.6%) patients with lymphoma, remission was achieved in 38 (59.4%) patients. The incidence of skin graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) symptoms in patients with relapse [14(53.8%)] was found to be significantly higher than in patients in remission [4(10.5%)] (p < 0.001). The most common symptoms seen in patients undergoing HSCT were oral mucositis (78.1%), febrile neutropenia (68.8%), and anemia (56.3%). In the treatments applied after SCT, the administration of antifungal (p = 0.033), analgesic (p = 0.001), and anticoagulant (p = 0.008) treatments to the patients who were in remission compared with the relapsed patients was significant. Less courses (OR: 0.446; 95% CI: 0.22-0.907; p = 0.026), analgesic therapy (OR:6.22; 95% CI: 1.61-24.027; p = 0.008), and anticoagulant treatment (OR:7.13; %) 95 CI: 1.374-37.1; p = 0.019) were found to increase the risk of relapse. Because of the increase in the number of cures in SCT, the incidence of diarrhea (p = 0.016) and GIS GVHD (p = 0.022) was high. It was determined that the hospitalization period was shorter in patients with febrile neutropenia (p = 0.021), thrombocytopenia/bleeding (p = 0.031), and secretion (p = 0.036) symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Patients experienced severe symptoms such as oral mucositis, febrile neutropenia, and anemia due to HSCT, and necessary treatment was applied for the symptoms. Further clinical studies must determine the symptoms and patient outcomes associated with SCT. It is predicted that patients will benefit from regular follow-up of their symptoms and planning of appropriate evidence-based nursing interventions and that this will improve the quality of care to be offered to them and increase their life span.

Tigecycline as salvage treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with haematological malignancies-a retrospective single-centre analysis of 200 cases.

Tigecycline has been used to treat patients with febrile neutropenia (FN). This study aims to analyse the effectiveness of tigecycline as salvage treatment of FN. Patients records from 09/2004 to 04/2019 were reviewed. Cases were eligible if fever persisted/recurred (p/r-FN) after 3 days of second-line treatment with a carbapenem, and were divided into three groups: switch to tigecycline (TGC group), switch to other antibiotics (OAB group), and no switch (W&W group). The primary endpoint was response rate (defervescence for ≥ 7 days or at least until discharge); the key secondary endpoint was 30-day mortality rate. Two hundred cases from 176 patients (median 59 years; 53.5% men) treated were included, mostly acute myeloid leukaemias (61.0%). 45.5% of cases were in the TGC group (in combination with an anti-pseudomonal antibiotic, mostly ceftazidime [95.6%]); 35.5% were in the OAB and 19.0% in the W&W group. There was no significant difference in response rates (TGC, 73.6%; OAB, 62.0%; W&W, 78.9%; p = 0.12) or 30-day mortality rates (TGC, 7.7%; OAB, 7.0%; W&W, 5.3%; p = 0.94). Tigecycline plus an anti-pseudomonal antibiotic does not improve response or 30-day mortality rate compared to other antibiotics in patients with p/r-FN. Also, in some cases, no switch in antibiotics may be necessary at all.

CE: Febrile Neutropenia in the Chemotherapy Patient.

ABSTRACT: Febrile neutropenia is a serious complication of chemotherapy treatment and may present as the only clinical sign of infection. If not addressed in a timely manner, it may progress to multisystem organ failure and may be fatal. Initial assessment of fever in those receiving chemotherapy requires prompt administration of antibiotics, ideally within one hour of presentation. Depending on the clinical status of the patient, antibiotic treatment may occur in the inpatient or outpatient setting. Nurses play an important role in the identification and treatment of patients at high risk for febrile neutropenia through assessment and adherence to clinical practice guidelines. In addition, nurses play an active role in patient education regarding risk factors, protective measures, and signs and symptoms of infection in the immunocompromised oncology patient.

Severe autoimune thyreotoxicosis complicated by febrile neutropenia as a result of thyreostatic therapy.

Hyperthyreoidism is a clinical manifestation of excessive production of thyroid hormones. In most cases pacient ´s condition allows ambulant treatment. Rarely, it can develop into an acute, life- threatening thyrotoxic crisis which has to be treated in the intensive care unit. Main therapy includes antithyroid medication, corticosteroids, beta- blockers and rehydratation, mostly parenteral. If initial treatment fails, plasmapheresis provides effective strategy. Antithyroid medication may come with side effects as rash, digestive issues, joint pain.Agranulocystosis or acute liver lesion which leads to liver failure belong among the most severe ones. In this case we report a pacient with thyrotoxic crisis, atrial fibrilation which led to ventricular fibrilation, cor thyreotoxicum. The treatment was complicated by febrile neutropenia.

Risk Factors and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Hematological Malignancies Complicated by Hospital-Acquired Infections.

Background and objectives: Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) have an increased risk of hospital-acquired infection (HAI). A diagnosis of cancer alone increases the risk of sepsis three-five-fold, which further increases the risk of nosocomial infection, subsequently deteriorates results, and leads to high mortality. In this study, we aimed to assess the mortality rate among hematologic oncologic patients with suspected infection who were subsequently admitted to the ICU and the predictive factors that are associated with high ICU mortality. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the hematological oncology critical care unit of a tertiary care hospital between November 2017 and February 2021. We analyzed anonymized medical records of hospitalized hematologic oncologic patients who were suspected or proven to have infection in the hematology-oncology department and were subsequently transferred to the ICU. Results: Both shorter hospitalization and shorter ICU stay length were observed in survivors [9.2 (7.7-10.4)] vs. non-survivors [10 (9.1-12.9), p = 0.004]. Sepsis had the highest hazard ratio (7.38) among all other factors, as patients with sepsis had higher mortality rates (98% among ICU non-survivors and 57% among ICU survivors) than those who had febrile neutropenia. Conclusions: The overall ICU mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies was 66%. Sepsis had the highest hazard ratio among all other predictive factors, as patients with sepsis had higher mortality rates than those who had febrile neutropenia. Chronic hepatitis (HBV and HCV) was significantly associated with higher ICU mortality.

Epidemiology and source of infection in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: an experience from a developing country.

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a life-threatening complication that predisposes cancer patients to serious infections. This study aims to describe the epidemiology and source of infection in cancer patients with FN in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: A hospital-based retrospective study was conducted in a large tertiary care hospital from January 2020 to December 2021. Data on cancer patients with FN were collected from the hospital information system. RESULTS: 150 cancer patients with FN were identified during the study period. Most patients were males (98; 65.3%), and the mean age of participants was 42.2 ± 16.0 years. Most patients (127; 84.7%) had hematologic malignancies, and acute myeloid leukemia was the most common diagnosis (42; 28%), followed by acute lymphocytic leukemia (28; 18.7%) and Hodgkin's lymphoma (20; 13.3%). Fifty-four (36%) patients had a median Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) scores greater than 21. Regarding the outcome, nine (6%) died, and 141(94%) were discharged. The focus of fever was unknown in most patients (108; 72%). Among the known origins of fever were colitis (12; 8%), pneumonia (8; 5.3%), cellulitis (6; 4%), bloodstream infections (7; 4.6%), perianal abscess (2; 1.3%) and others. The median duration of fever was two days, and the median duration of neutropenia was seven days. Sixty-three (42%) patients had infections: 56 (73.3%) were bacterial, four (2.6%) were viral, two (1%) were fungal and 1 (0.7%) was parasitic. Among the bacterial causes, 50 cases (89.2%) were culture-positive. Among the culture-positive cases, 34 (68%) were gram-positive and 22 (44%) were gram-negative. The most frequent gram-positive bacteria were E. faecalis (9; 18% of culture-positive cases), and the most frequent gram-negative organisms were Klebsiella pneumoniae (5; 10%). Levofloxacin was the most commonly used prophylactic antibiotic (23; 15.33%), followed by acyclovir (1610.7%) and fluconazole in 15 patients (10%). Amikacin was the most popular empiric therapy, followed by piperacillin/tazobactam (74; 49.3%), ceftazidime (70; 46.7%), and vancomycin (63; 42%). One-third of E. faecalis isolates were resistant to ampicillin. Approximately two-thirds of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftazidime. Amikacin resistance was proven in 20% of isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients suffered from hematologic malignancies. Less than half of the patients had infections, and the majority were bacterial. Gram-positive bacteria comprised two-thirds of cases. Therefore, empiric therapy was appropriate and in accordance with the antibiogram of the isolated bacteria.

Does ferritin level affect the outcomes of autologous stem cell transplantation equally in all diseases?

BACKGROUND: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the effect of ferritin levels on the outcomes of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with MM or lymphoma. METHODS: In this study, 170 patients with measured ferritin levels within one month before transplantation who underwent ASCT with the diagnosis of MM or lymphoma were evaluated. The cut-off value of ferritin was determined as 500 ng/mL to evaluate the transplant outcomes in both groups. The hematological recovery status/duration, febrile neutropenia rate, hospitalization time, transplant-related mortality (TRM) in the first 100 days, and OS were evaluated according to the ferritin level RESULTS: Of all patients, 105 (61,8%) were diagnosed with MM and 65 (38.2%) with lymphoma. Ferritin levels had no statistically significant effect on the engraftment status/times, the febrile neutropenia rates, and hospitalization times of both lymphoma and myeloma patients (p > .05). Ferritin level was not significantly associated with TRM in MM (p = .224). However, in lymphoma, ferritin level was significantly associated with TRM (33.3% for ferritin level ≥500 ng/L vs. 5.3% for ferritin level ng/mL, p = .005). There was no statistically significant correlation between ferritin value and OS in MM group [ferritin level ≥ 500 ng/L: 39.9 months (95% CI: 33.7-46.1) and ferritin level 500 ng/mL: 39.4 months (95% CI: 36.5-42.2), p = .446]. Ferritin level was significantly associated with OS in patients with lymphoma [ferritin level ≥ 500 ng/L: 22.1 months 95% CI: 14.7-29.5), ferritin level 500 ng/mL: 27.3 months (95% CI: 22.4-32.2), p = .038] CONCLUSION: High ferritin level is important prognostic factor on survival after ASCT in patients with lymphoma.

Immune signatures, testing, and management of febrile neutropenia in pediatric cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Infectious complications, particularly invasive bacterial and fungal infections, are still a major cause of morbidity in pediatric cancer patients and are associated with significant mortality. Over the last few years, there has been much effort in defining risk groups to tailor antimicrobial therapy, and in establishing pediatric-specific guidelines for antimicrobial strategies. AREAS COVERED: This review provides a critical overview of defining risk groups for infection, diagnostic work-up, antimicrobial prophylaxis, empirical therapy, and treatment of established infections. EXPERT OPINION: To date, no generalizable risk prediction model has been established for pediatric cancer patients. There is growing interest in defining the impact of the individual genetic background on infectious complications. New diagnostic tools have been developed over the last few years, but they need to be validated in pediatric cancer patients. International, pediatric-specific guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis, empirical therapy, and treatment of established infections have recently been published and will harmonize antimicrobial strategies in the future.

Can Risk Stratification Tools Be Utilized to Safely Discharge Low-Risk Febrile Neutropenic Patients from the Emergency Department?

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) is one of the more common oncological emergencies. Despite evidence in the oncology literature suggesting that low-risk cases of FN can be managed safely at home, most patients with FN who present to the emergency department (ED) are admitted. FN risk stratification methods, such as Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE) scores, may be useful when considering patient disposition. We sought to address whether the existing body of literature is adequate to support the use of these methods when treating patients with FN in the ED. METHODS: A PubMed search from January 1, 2016 to March 19, 2021 was performed using the following search strategy: "febrile neutropenia" OR (fever AND neutropenia)) AND (emerg* OR outpatient) AND (admit OR admission OR hospitalization). General review articles and case reports were omitted. Each of the articles selected underwent a structured review. RESULTS: The search yielded 371 articles, which were independently screened for relevance by two authors, and 23 articles were selected for inclusion. MASCC score was used in 10 of the identified studies and each of these studies concluded that the score was useful in the ED. Most of the identified studies found that CISNE score had a higher sensitivity than MASCC score (96.7% vs. 32.9%, respectively), but a lower specificity (22.2% vs. 89.5%). CONCLUSIONS: FN risk stratifications tools, such as MASCC and CISNE scores, are supported by the existing literature and may be included as part of the decision-making process when considering patient disposition.

Assessment of Antimicrobial Utilization among Cancer Patients with Febrile Neutropenia at the Lebanese Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia is a prevalent oncologic complication. Initiating rapid treatment with empirical antimicrobials in febrile neutropenia patients reduces mortality due to infections. OBJECTIVES: The study aims to evaluate antimicrobial utilization among FN patients in Lebanon in terms of drug choice, dose, and duration of the treatment. This is a retrospective, multicenter, observational study conducted at three different Lebanese university hospitals (in which the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines are adopted), between February 2014 and May 2017. METHODS: Adult cancer patients aged 18 years and older with febrile neutropenia were included in the study. Using the IDSA guidelines as a reference, patients were assessed whether they received the antimicrobial regimen inconsistent with the IDSA reference or not. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Science software (SPSS version 22.0). The adherence to guidelines for the indication and doses of antibiotics and anti-fungal in patients with febrile neutropenia. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients with a mean age of 54.43 ± 17.86 years were enrolled in the study. Leukemia (29.7%) was the most prevalent cancer and the most common infection was sepsis (20.2%). Combination antibiotic lactams are the most prescribed antibiotics (86.8%). Only 94 (86.23%) patients were given the antibiotic therapy appropriate for choice, dose, and duration. Empirical antifungal therapy was initiated in 63.7% of the patients and fluconazole was the most used antifungal (36.3%). In contrast to antibiotics, the majority of antifungal choices were not selected according to the recommendations and they were considered inappropriate for doses and the required treatment duration as proposed by (IDSA). Fifty-eight percent of patients received antivirals, even though it is not recommended as empirical treatment. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study reveals a non-consistent antimicrobial utilization practice at the involved sites concerning FN treatment. Inappropriateness was encountered in drug selection, dose, and duration of treatment with antifungals and antivirals.